Stakeholder communication is one of the most important skills a buyer can develop and one of the least formally taught. Knowing your numbers is good. Being able to present them in a way that means something to the specific person opposite you is the actual skill.
Jump to:
Stakeholder Communication Starts With One Dreaded Meeting
It is not the supplier negotiation and it is not the range sign-off, though both carry their own pressure. It is the meeting with a director, a head of department or a commercial lead.
Someone with very little time, who asks precise questions, and whose view of your capability will shape exactly how much freedom you are given to make decisions on your own.
What I have watched happen repeatedly is that junior buyers know their category well. By the time they are in that room they have done the work, they have the data, and they understand what is happening in their range and why. The conversation still does not go the way they prepared for.
The director asks a follow-up and the buyer loses her thread. Or she gives an answer that is technically correct and far too detailed, so it sounds like waffle and the senior person has moved on before she has finished. Or she second-guesses herself, covers every angle, and leaves the room with nobody quite sure what she believes.
Podcast Thrive in Fashion Buying & Merchandising
Episode 050, How Junior Fashion Buyers Lose Credibility With Senior Stakeholders (And How to Fix It).
Being able to hold your position in a room with a director is a commercial skill before it is a communication one, because the confidence comes from knowing your numbers well enough to defend them. The Thrive in Fashion Buying and Merchandising course builds that foundation, from OTB and margin through to how you present a trading position.
Senior Stakeholders Are Not Listening the Way Your Manager Does
This is the single thing that changes how these conversations go.
Your manager understands your category. She is involved in the detail and that is the level at which she is making decisions, so context and background are genuinely useful to her.
A director is operating somewhere else entirely. She is not getting into the detail of your range. She is looking at whether the business is moving in the right direction, whether anything needs her attention or a decision only she can make, and whether you have a clear point of view about what happens next. That is the whole frame.
What junior buyers do is present to a director exactly as they would present to their manager, with full context and careful explanation. At operational level that detail is valuable. In a room with a director it works against you, because it demonstrates that you cannot yet judge what level of detail suits the audience.
Start With the Conclusion
If you find yourself beginning at the beginning every time, with the context, the background and the history, try building the conversation the other way round.
Open with what is actually happening in your category, what you think it means, and what you are recommending as a next step. Then offer the detail if it is wanted.
Buyers construct their communication the way they construct their analysis, working forward from the evidence. That makes sense when you are the one doing the thinking. It does not work when you are presenting to someone who needs the answer first in order to decide whether any of the detail is relevant to her.
Take a Position, Not Just a Data Set
This is where confident junior buyers most often come unstuck, and it is connected to the point above.
There is a tendency early in a buying career to present the data and let it speak for itself. Share the numbers, describe what happened, wait for the senior person to draw the conclusion. But she is not looking for a data presentation. She is looking for evidence of your commercial judgement. She wants to know what you think the numbers mean and what you think should happen next.
Over-qualifying works against you in the same way. Covering every angle, adding caveat after caveat, reads as a lack of confidence in your own analysis. If you do not appear to trust your judgement, it becomes very difficult for anyone else to trust it.
There is nothing wrong with saying you are working with incomplete data, or that there are two possible readings and you lean towards one. That is honest and useful. What you want to avoid is presenting information while taking no position at all, because it signals you are not yet ready to own your commercial thinking. You will be wrong occasionally. Being wrong sometimes and learning from it does far less damage to a career than consistently failing to form a view.
The Questions Behind the Questions
Senior stakeholders ask questions that sound straightforward and are usually testing something more specific.
When a director asks what is driving underperformance in a category, she is not looking for a casual explanation. She is testing whether you understand the business well enough to have already thought through the consequences, and whether you have a response prepared.
When a commercial lead asks how confident you are in your forward plan, she is not asking for a percentage. She is asking whether you have stress tested your assumptions and whether you know what would have to change for the plan to be wrong.
Preparation is not only knowing your numbers. It is working out the three or four follow-up questions those numbers could prompt, and having a clear answer for each. Where are the gaps? What would I want to know if I were on the other side of this table? What else could this information raise?
What to Do When You Are Challenged
How you respond when a senior stakeholder pushes back demonstrates your commercial maturity more than almost anything else you said in the meeting.
Being challenged does not mean you are wrong. Sometimes the person is stress testing your thinking. Sometimes she holds information you do not have. Sometimes she genuinely disagrees. All three need a different response, and knowing which situation you are in takes experience. It is very hard to read in the moment, which is exactly why it is worth preparing for.
Two responses damage credibility more than having the wrong answer. The first is over-apologising, which shows the confidence was not there to begin with. The second is becoming defensive, which treats a commercial challenge as a personal criticism.
What builds credibility is calm, precise and honest. Acknowledge the challenge. Then either defend the position with additional evidence, or accept that the challenge has introduced something worth thinking about and commit to coming back with a revised view. Both of those are strong answers. Neither requires you to have been right.
Elisabeth's Final Thoughts
A supplier negotiation needs a different register to a trade meeting, and a trade meeting needs a different one again to a conversation with a director. Moving between those contexts easily is a skill, and the best buyers develop it over years, often without noticing they are doing it. Almost none of it is formally taught, because the assumption is that if you understand your category you will find a way to talk about it. Most people are not naturally composed under pressure. What makes the difference is preparation, and knowing in advance that how you handle being challenged will be noticed and remembered.
Stakeholder Communication FAQs
Start with the conclusion rather than the background. Tell them what is happening in your category, what you think it means and what you are recommending. Offer the detail afterwards if it is asked for. Senior stakeholders are deciding whether something needs their attention, not following your analysis step by step.
Your manager knows your category and is making decisions at operational level, so context and detail are useful to her. A director is looking at whether the business is moving in the right direction, whether anything needs a decision only they can make, and whether you have a clear point of view. Presenting to both the same way signals that you cannot judge what level of detail suits the audience.
Give your view. A senior stakeholder is not looking for a data presentation, they are looking for evidence of your commercial judgement. Presenting figures without taking a position signals that you are not ready to own your own thinking, and a buyer who does not appear to trust her conclusions is difficult for anyone else to trust.
Work out which of three things is happening: they are stress testing your thinking, they hold information you do not, or they genuinely disagree. Each needs a different response. What damages credibility in all three cases is over-apologising or becoming defensive. A calm, precise answer that either adds evidence or acknowledges a fair point carries far more weight.
Knowing your numbers is the starting point, not the preparation. Work out the three or four follow-up questions those numbers could prompt and have an answer ready for each. Ask yourself what you would want to know if you were sitting on the other side of the table, and where the gaps in your own position are.
