Fashion school gives you a creative foundation and very little of what a buying office actually measures you on. That gap is the reason so many capable graduates spend their first two years quietly wondering whether they are supposed to already know all of this.
Jump to:
Fashion School Leaves You Undertrained, Not Underqualified
A bright, enthusiastic graduate lands her first buying job. Within a few weeks she is quietly panicking.
She has to learn how ranges are actually built. She has to unlearn what she thought trends and colour meant and understand how they apply to different customer types. Then someone mentions OTB, or asks for a markdown report, or wants to see the margin on a buy, and she has no idea what is being asked of her.
I have watched that collision between creative confidence and commercial reality happen repeatedly across twenty five years, and I include myself in it. I studied fashion design. I could draft patterns, build mood boards, make product, and I understood fabric. My first role in industry was as a designer in a factory producing private label childrenswear, and one of the sample machinists told me I should know everything because I had been to college. I had never set foot in a factory. For a while I did what everyone does, which is to act with more confidence than I had.
The point worth holding onto is that most buyers do not fail through lack of ability. They struggle because nobody showed them how the creative side connects to the commercial side, and both have to work or none of us has a job.
Podcast Thrive in Fashion Buying & Merchandising
Episode 039, Why a Fashion Degree Does Not Prepare You to Be a Buyer.
Also on this topic:
Episode 024, What Fashion School Leaves Out of a Buying Education.
Episode 034, Why Junior Buyers Feel Lost (It’s Not Your Fault – You Were Never Trained).
If this describes where you are, the first useful step is knowing exactly which skills are missing rather than assuming all of them are. The free Fashion Buyer Skills Assessment maps your current strengths against what the role requires, so you can be specific about what to work on.
Why the Gap Exists
A few years ago I was invited onto an industry panel reviewing the structure of a university’s fashion courses, specifically to look at how they might build in more of the reality of the business.
Two things came out of it. The courses remain largely theoretical. And they are taught in silos, so a student learns a module without it connecting to any of the others.
That second point is the real problem. In buying, everything connects. Every decision you take affects another part of the business, often six to twelve months later. A course structured as separate modules trains people to think in separate modules, which is precisely the habit a buying office has to undo.
At their core, fashion schools are designed like art schools rather than business schools. They teach you to think like a designer or a stylist, not like a commercial buyer responsible for millions in stock.
The Skills That Are Missing
Colour theory, design, pattern cutting and trend forecasting are not bad skills. They are creative skills, and they are not buyer skills.
- Reading an open to buy spreadsheet and understanding what drives the number rather than what it currently says.
- Calculating margin and knowing the difference between what you buy at and what you achieve.
- Budget management across a season, phased by month and by category.
- Supplier negotiation, including terms, lead times and capacity rather than cost price alone.
- Critical path management, and what a missed approval date does to a delivery.
- Markdown strategy and how to plan it rather than react to it.
- Sell-through analysis used to inform the next buy rather than to report on the last one.
There is also depth missing on the technical side. Buyers need fabric knowledge, but they need it attached to costings, procurement lead times and which manufacturer can actually work with a given cloth. Buyers write product briefs, which requires specification management and a commercial viability assessment of the thing being developed.
When I have given masterclasses to fashion buying students, the reaction is consistent. They are genuinely shocked at the number of spreadsheets involved and at how much of the role is data analysis.
Expectation Against Reality in a Buying Office
Some of the gap is about skills. Some of it is about a picture of the job that does not survive contact with it.
The glamorous version exists, and it is a small proportion of the week. There are trade shows, market visits and occasionally a fashion show. I once travelled to Tokyo to visit the Sanrio head office, having grown up with the brand, and it was a genuinely surreal moment. Those days are real and they are the exception.
Most of the week is spreadsheets, performance metrics, production delays and supplier meetings about product development. Market visits are hard work: a great deal of walking, heavy bags and long days. The trip you remember is followed by the emails and approvals that waited while you were away.
The other expectation worth correcting is about creative control. Many aspiring buyers imagine shaping a range on instinct. In reality every decision sits inside a framework of budget constraints, open to buy limits, costing challenges, customer profiles and sales targets. The oversized neon trench coat you love will not make the range if the data says your customer buys timeless pieces in neutral tones.
Trend forecasting is a similar case. For someone who has spent hours on runway research, it is a surprise to learn that trend is not the primary driver of a buying decision. Sales data, customer insight and margin come first. It has to be what sells at a profit, not only what is interesting.
Where Buyers Get Caught in a Budget Meeting
Picture a junior buyer presenting her seasonal plan. On paper it looks strong. The range is well built, the trends are right, and the work behind it is obvious.
Then she is asked about her allocation strategy, her open to buy position and her product mix, and she is not sure how to answer. That is the moment the assessment changes, and it has nothing to do with the quality of the product she selected.
Until you have the financial and commercial skills, you will not be handed full budget responsibility. When a senior buyer says you are not commercial, or not strong on figures, that is what is meant. It is rarely a comment on your taste.
The most common specific error I see is treating open to buy as a shopping budget. It is not what you can afford right now, and it is not simply budget minus confirmed orders. I worked with a buyer who had committed sixty per cent of her spring budget by January. The product was good and right for the customer, so this was not a product judgement problem. By March, when new trends were coming through and she wanted stock for April deliveries, the budget was gone and she had to pass. A senior buyer, shown the same product, asks when it delivers, what the selling window is, and how that timing sits against existing commitments before she confirms anything.
How to Close the Gap in Your Current Role
This is fixable, and it is fixable where you are rather than after another qualification.
I mentored a junior buyer at a high street brand who had been told after a range review that she was not commercial enough. Sitting down with her, it became clear she did not know how to read her sales reports, and equally clear that nobody had ever shown her. Once sell-through, margin targets and stock holding made sense, reading a sales report became a different activity entirely. There was nothing remarkable about it. It was structure, and someone to explain it.
Start by asking how your reports are built and what each figure represents. Learn the metrics that come up in your Monday trading meeting and go in knowing where you stand against budget. Then connect one product decision a week through the full commercial chain, from cost to margin to sell-through forecast.
The change shows up in how you are heard. There is a difference between saying you think something will sell and saying a style sold through at seventy eight per cent. When you can speak commercially, people listen differently, because they can see you understand the product and the numbers.
Elisabeth's Final Thoughts
Buyers who look calm and confident in a range review are not usually more talented than the ones who do not. They are better prepared, and they know what is expected at each stage of the process. That is a foundation you build rather than something you either have or lack. If you understand the full buying cycle, from research through planning and trade review to supplier negotiation and post-season analysis, you stop guessing. You will not feel behind, because you will not be.
Fashion School and Fashion Buying FAQs
No. I have hired and promoted both graduates and non-graduates, and I have seen both groups plateau. The difference is not the educational background. It is what someone understands about how the business operates and how that shows up in their decision making. A degree gives you a foundation. It does not give you the commercial skills the role is measured on.
How to read an open to buy spreadsheet, calculate a margin, manage a budget, negotiate supplier terms, manage a critical path, set a markdown strategy, or analyse sell-through data to inform the next buy. Courses are largely theoretical and taught in silos, so modules rarely connect. In buying, everything connects.
Because you probably are undertrained rather than underqualified. New buyers are expected to arrive productive, and much of the learning happens by absorption. Most buyers do not struggle because they lack ability. They struggle because nobody explained how the creative side connects to the commercial side, and they were expected to work it out unaided.
Ask someone to walk you through how your sales reports are built and what each figure represents. Learn sell-through, margin and stock holding properly, then connect one product decision a week through the full commercial chain. Being able to say a style sold through at 78 per cent, rather than that you think it will sell, changes how you are heard in a meeting.
It is worth it for the creative foundation, the industry exposure and the network, and it is not sufficient on its own. A fashion degree will not teach you open to buy, margin management, critical path or supplier negotiation, which are the skills a buying role is measured on. Treat the degree as the starting point and plan deliberately for the commercial training it does not include.
It depends entirely on what the gap is. If you can build a range but cannot explain your allocation strategy or your open to buy position in a budget meeting, a degree has not left you short of talent. It has left you short of commercial training, and that is a specific gap that structured teaching closes faster than experience alone will.
